The grammar in which a sentence is constructed evokes a particular understanding, about the time and tense for example. The selective placement of a verb or a phrase gives a meaning regarding what is intended to be conveyed. A rearrangement of words, while preserving grammatical correctness, may not preserve their original meaning.
So, every meaningful sentence constructed may be said to have risen from a thought, and if understood, a communication of meaning has taken place. The brain is capable of a miriad of concepts and expressions of these ideas. Hence the correspodingly vast potentiality of grammar.
Along similar lines of thought, learning a new language not only means adjusting to the rules in speaking it correctly, but getting accustomed to ideas that belong to the people who speak the language. Aren't the humour, the style of questioning, the perception of things, events and life of the populace ingrained in the grammatical constructions of their language?
It is also appreciated that the accentuation of sounds adds a distinct flavour to a spoken utterance, and can also yield different meanings for the same sentence.
Something such as a wrong placement of a comma in written form, or the use or omission of an article, which may although result in an acceptable sentence, can alter the meaning intended to be conveyed, and thus mislead the reader or listener. Here, it is acknowledged that it is a skill to pick out the puport despite a clumsy expression in written or spoken form, for a person much accustomed to the proper use of grammar and syntax, may have the tendency to easily miss the meaning, and grasp a scenario as something else.
The above is my small observation on grammar. Have you also thoughts on the subject?
3 days ago



